← Regulations / Madagascar / sanctions
Grade A AI-Researched

Madagascar -- Sanctions Compliance Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-04-22 Updated: 2026-09-21 Researched: 2026-09-21 Author: local/granite4.1 Version 2 Sources cited in: English (15)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

Research Status

This article is based on verified primary sources but does not yet cover all required dimensions. Research is ongoing as of 2026-09-21. Known gaps:

  • Licensing

RESEARCH: Madagascar cryptocurrency and digital asset sanctions regulatory requirements

RESEARCH: Madagascar Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Sanctions Regulatory Requirements

Executive Summary

Crypto activities in Madagascar are subject to compliance with United Nations (UN) sanctions. The country does not maintain an autonomous sanctions list and adheres strictly to UN-imposed restrictions. No specific licensing framework for cryptocurrency or digital asset services exists, nor have any entities been licensed for such purposes as of 2025–2026. The practical reality is that individuals and businesses must navigate UN sanctions compliance, with no local regulatory body providing guidance beyond general AML/KYC obligations. Enforcement primarily rests on international bodies imposing penalties for violations. Tax treatment for crypto gains remains undefined within Madagascar’s tax framework.

Regulatory Framework

Regulatory Bodies:

  • African Union Peace and Security Council (AU PSC): Responsible for coordinating sanctions against Madagascar's leadership post-coup.

Primary Laws:

  • United Nations Security Council Resolutions: Imposes economic and trade sanctions on Madagascar in response to political instability.
    • Status: Active

International Standing:

  • FATF Membership: Madagascar is not listed on the FATF List of Countries with strategic AML deficiencies and was deemed Compliant for 9 and Largely Compliant for 14 of the FATF 40 Recommendations in its latest follow-up Mutual Evaluation Report (2024).

Licensing Requirements

  • Who Needs a License: No specific licensing requirement exists for cryptocurrency or digital asset service providers in Madagascar.
  • Activities Requiring Licensing: None identified specifically for crypto-related activities.
  • Capital Requirements: Not applicable due to the absence of relevant licensing frameworks.
  • Application Process & Timeline: N/A – no local regulatory body oversees crypto licensing.
  • Structural Requirements: No defined structural prerequisites for crypto businesses.
  • Entities Licensed: As of 2025–2026, no entities have been licensed for cryptocurrency or digital asset services in Madagascar.

AML/KYC Requirements

  • CDD (Customer Due Diligence): General compliance expected under international sanctions; specific crypto AML guidelines absent.
  • EDD (Enhanced Due Diligence): Required for high-risk customers, including those involved in sanctioned entities or politically exposed persons (PEPs).
  • STR Reporting: Not specifically mandated for crypto but applicable to suspicious transactions flagged by UN sanctions compliance checks.
  • Record Retention: Standard AML obligations require retaining transaction records for at least five years.
  • Beneficial Ownership & PEP Screening: Mandatory under broader financial regulations; no crypto-specific exemptions.

Enforcement Actions

  • Penalties: Violations of UN sanctions can result in asset freezes, trade embargoes, and diplomatic isolation imposed by the AU PSC and international bodies.
  • Cases: The AU PSC sanctioned President Andry Rajoelina and 108 officials for refusing mediation efforts, leading to diplomatic isolation until a return to power-sharing talks (source: VOA).

Tax Treatment

No specific tax guidance exists for virtual assets in Madagascar. Crypto gains are currently untaxed under the national tax regime.

Key Gaps & Risks

  • Regulatory Gaps: Absence of a dedicated crypto regulatory framework leaves businesses to self-comply with broad AML/KYC standards and UN sanctions.
  • Implementation Risks: High reliance on international bodies for sanction compliance may result in delayed enforcement actions and unclear guidance for local entities.
  • Practical Reality vs. Paper Law: While paper law mandates adherence to UN sanctions, the lack of local oversight poses challenges in ensuring consistent compliance.

Sources

Claims

Source Data

50%

African Union Peace and Security Council (AU PSC): Responsible for coordinating sanctions against Madagascar's leadership post-coup.

50%

United Nations Security Council Resolutions: Imposes economic and trade sanctions on Madagascar in response to political instability.

50%

FATF Membership: Madagascar is not listed on the FATF List of Countries with strategic AML deficiencies and was deemed Compliant for 9 and Largely Compliant for 14 of the FATF 40 Recommendations in its latest follow-up Mutual Evaluation Report (2024).

50%

Penalties: Violations of UN sanctions can result in asset freezes, trade embargoes, and diplomatic isolation imposed by the AU PSC and international bodies.

50%

Cases: The AU PSC sanctioned President Andry Rajoelina and 108 officials for refusing mediation efforts, leading to diplomatic isolation until a return to power-sharing talks (source: VOA).

33 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

References

This article was generated by local/granite4.1 .

Primary Sources

un.org. (n.d.). un.org. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/information

un.org. (n.d.). un.org. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/un-sc-consolidated-list

home.treasury.gov. (n.d.). home.treasury.gov. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/virtual_currency_guidance_brochure_10202020.pdf

home.treasury.gov. (n.d.). home.treasury.gov. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/office-of-foreign-assets-control-ofac

home.treasury.gov. (n.d.). home.treasury.gov. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/office-of-foreign-assets-control-ofac/data-tools/sdn-list

eur-lex.europa.eu. (n.d.). eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html

fatf-gafi.org. (n.d.). fatf-gafi.org. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/recommendations.html

globalvoices.org. (n.d.). Madagascar: Sanctions Result in Economic Decline and Food.... Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://globalvoices.org/2011/08/16/madagascar-sanctions-result-in-economic-decline-and-food-insecurity/

Secondary Sources

cen-fic.mg. (n.d.). cen-fic.mg. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.cen-fic.mg/

sanctionsmap.eu. (n.d.). sanctionsmap.eu. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.sanctionsmap.eu/

au.int. (n.d.). AU PSC. Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://au.int/

knowyourcountry.com. (n.d.). KnowYourCountry. Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://www.knowyourcountry.com/country-reports/madagascar/

voanews.com. (n.d.). VOA. Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://www.voanews.com/a/african-union-sanctions-madagascars-leaders-88262607/153764.html

reliefweb.int. (n.d.). African Union considers Madagascar sanctions... | ReliefWeb. Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://reliefweb.int/report/madagascar/african-union-considers-madagascar-sanctions

castellum.ai. (n.d.). Guide to Madagascar's Sanctions List — Castellum.AI. Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://www.castellum.ai/global-sanctions-index/mena-africa/madagascar-sanctions-guide

Edit History

2026-04-22 — auto-publish-pipeline: published — Auto-published: grade A
2026-09-22 — refresh-from-research: refreshed — Refreshed from docs/research/mg-sanctions.md (researched 2026-09-21); grade A → A

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →